<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quote from Why We Love the Church</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socaltheologica.com/2009/11/17/quote-from-why-we-love-the-church/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socaltheologica.com/2009/11/17/quote-from-why-we-love-the-church/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Wright</title>
		<link>http://socaltheologica.com/2009/11/17/quote-from-why-we-love-the-church/#comment-2745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucas Wright]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 19:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socaltheologica.com/?p=2395#comment-2745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it is only unhelpful in the same way many people associated with the &#039;emergents&#039; abuse the word postmodern. While their list is perhaps a bit general (and really funny) it displays the same misunderstanding of any conception of postmodern or critical thought that many &#039;emergents&#039; display. On the whole I think this is a funny post but would say that the way in which such folks as the emergents need to be critiqued is probably more adequately undertaken in the work of William Cavanaugh, Hauerwas, and Milbank as their deconstructions of liberal democracy from the traditions and sacraments of the historic Church really cut down the new liberal individualism that many in the emergent camp seem to arrogantly display. I include myself in that as well, at least the &#039;I&#039; who I was 2 years ago :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is only unhelpful in the same way many people associated with the &#8216;emergents&#8217; abuse the word postmodern. While their list is perhaps a bit general (and really funny) it displays the same misunderstanding of any conception of postmodern or critical thought that many &#8216;emergents&#8217; display. On the whole I think this is a funny post but would say that the way in which such folks as the emergents need to be critiqued is probably more adequately undertaken in the work of William Cavanaugh, Hauerwas, and Milbank as their deconstructions of liberal democracy from the traditions and sacraments of the historic Church really cut down the new liberal individualism that many in the emergent camp seem to arrogantly display. I include myself in that as well, at least the &#8216;I&#8217; who I was 2 years ago <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Bennett</title>
		<link>http://socaltheologica.com/2009/11/17/quote-from-why-we-love-the-church/#comment-2689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Bennett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socaltheologica.com/?p=2395#comment-2689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I actually find DeYoung and Kluck&#039;s list very unhelpful and banal.

Though certainly sprinkled with a smattering shallow realities, all they have done is sewn a strawman together from stereotyped scraps of nebulous fringe and then batted it about with their cute little quips.

I have not read the book, nor the larger context the quote resides within, but I hope that the rest is better than this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually find DeYoung and Kluck&#8217;s list very unhelpful and banal.</p>
<p>Though certainly sprinkled with a smattering shallow realities, all they have done is sewn a strawman together from stereotyped scraps of nebulous fringe and then batted it about with their cute little quips.</p>
<p>I have not read the book, nor the larger context the quote resides within, but I hope that the rest is better than this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

